Commercial flexographic printing (except books) · Nevada

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West

Reno, NV · ~107 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial flexographic printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade D.

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West: 4.8 TCR = 146% of Commercial flexographic printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West safety composite

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2020

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West injury rate improved

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West's TCR fell 1.6 from 5.6 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Reno, NV ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 146% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO Louisville Operation…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Louisville Operations, 7929 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GARLOCK Printing & Converting West averages 4.8 TCR (146% of the Commercial flexographic printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=7 · 2020=4 · BLS 3.3

Where GARLOCK Printing & Converting West falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial flexographic printi establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Commercial flexographic printi employers in Nevada.

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West (107 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate GARLOCK Printing & Converting West
GARLOCK Printing & Converting West (107 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

GARLOCK Printing & Converting West has more employees than the Commercial flexographic printing (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.0 4.0 3 1 0
2019 7.0 6.0 7 0 0
2018 2.8 0.9 2 1 0
2017 5.6 3.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NV · Reno

2,001 Commercial flexographic printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Louisville Operations, 7929 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lancaster East 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omni Systems Inc 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Strouse 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Savage and Son, Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE CertainTeed Gypsum 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE American AVK Company 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR Corrugated Gear and Services, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tidelands Health Rehabilitation Hospital an Affiliate of Encompass Health 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County of Harnett-Public Utilities 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun State Central Florida 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avalon 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camb Primary 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bivio Transport & Logistics, Co 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennsburg Manor 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.