Water supply systems · North Carolina

County of Harnett-Public Utilities

Lillington, NC · ~108 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

County of Harnett-Public Utilities runs at 403% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water supply systems workplace, earning a grade F.

County of Harnett-Public Utilities: 4.8 TCR = 403% of Water supply systems BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

County of Harnett-Public Utilities safety composite

County of Harnett-Public Utilities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2016→2020

County of Harnett-Public Utilities injury rate improved

County of Harnett-Public Utilities's TCR fell 8.1 from 10.4 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Lillington, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 403% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #16/33
  • PHOTO Sacramento Suburban …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sacramento Suburban Water District Corp Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

County of Harnett-Public Utilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows County of Harnett-Public Utilities averages 4.8 TCR (403% of the Water supply systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

County of Harnett-Public Utilities TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.3 · BLS 1.2

Where County of Harnett-Public Utilities falls in its industry

727 Water supply systems establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 33 Water supply systems employers in North Carolina.

County of Harnett-Public Utilities (108 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate County of Harnett-Public Utilities
County of Harnett-Public Utilities (108 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

County of Harnett-Public Utilities has more employees than the Water supply systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2019 3.7 0.7 4 1 0
2018 2.8 0.7 3 1 0
2016 10.4 6.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · NC · Lillington

727 Water supply systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 35 employers in Lillington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sacramento Suburban Water District Corp Yard 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EPCOR Clovis Water, EPCOR Water New Mexico Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TOWN OF FOREST CITY - PUBLIC UTILITIES 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moulton Niguel Water District 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samet Corporation - Charlotte 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seretta Construction Mid-Atlantic, LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (Charlotte) 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE McRae Industries Footwear Finishing / Shipping 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Sheriff Department 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Social Services 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Home Builders 023 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Harnett-Emergency Management 179 FTE
NAT-TCR Sun State Central Florida 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tidelands Health Rehabilitation Hospital an Affiliate of Encompass Health 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GARLOCK Printing & Converting West 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HDT Global Tanner 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chemtron Corporation Plant 2 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Central Utility of WI, LLC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Hall West 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE WHI Cleveland East Management LLC 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.