Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, manufacturing · California

Garnsey

Santa Ana, CA · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garnsey runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Garnsey: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garnsey safety composite

Garnsey scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Garnsey injury rate improved

Garnsey's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.4 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Santa Ana, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO Veolia WTS Services …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Veolia WTS Services USA, Inc - San Jose Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Garnsey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garnsey averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garnsey TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Garnsey falls in its industry

361 Garbage disposal units, commer establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Garbage disposal units, commer employers in California.

Garnsey (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Garnsey
Garnsey (95 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Garnsey has more employees than the Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.5 2.2 4 0 0
2022 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2020 3.9 1.0 2 2 0
2019 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2018 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · CA · Santa Ana

361 Garbage disposal units, commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 492 employers in Santa Ana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Veolia WTS Services USA, Inc - San Jose Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Edwards Air Force Base (3733) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Yale Industries LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Earth Plastic Recycling 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Del Llano Farms 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Altos Farms, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE TreeSource 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Think Together 2,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Ana 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orange County/Los Angeles 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR 056937-SANTA ANA CA P&DC 920 FTE
NAT-TCR Public Works Bridge and Street Operations 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilltop Lumber Alexandria 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 30492 - Capstnoe Mclane Western 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rockford 060 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prinsco, Inc. - Willmar 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Park Middle School 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kollmorgen KTCS (LC) KL9000 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.