Antiscaling compounds manufacturing · New Jersey

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed

Edison, NJ · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Antiscaling compounds manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Antiscaling compounds manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed safety composite

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2019

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO PLZ Corp Pacific
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLZ Corp Pacific (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garratt-Callahan Company Ed averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Antiscaling compounds manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Garratt-Callahan Company Ed falls in its industry

485 Antiscaling compounds manufact establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Antiscaling compounds manufact employers in New Jersey.

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Garratt-Callahan Company Ed
Garratt-Callahan Company Ed (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Garratt-Callahan Company Ed has fewer employees than the Antiscaling compounds manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · NJ · Edison

485 Antiscaling compounds manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLZ Corp Pacific 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KIK Custom Products Main 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Brands; PH&G Chapin Manufacturing 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FUJIFILM Electronic Materials U.S.A., Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washington TWP MUA 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Martin Group 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1127 - BELFOR Northern New Jersey NJ 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Newark 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR Colket Translational Research 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta DCH 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion - BMD 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Presort Services- Charlotte 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Great Northern Plains District : SVC-Fargo ND-USA 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Home Care 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunbelt Vacuum Service, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Lighting 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.