Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies

Hollidaysburg, PA · ~288 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies: 8.2 TCR = 217% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies safety composite

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2018

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies injury rate improved

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies's TCR fell 5.4 from 10.6 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.6 · 2017=8.8 · 2018=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hollidaysburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 217% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #148/257
  • PHOTO Toby Weinman Assiste…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~288 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toby Weinman Assisted Living Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies averages 8.2 TCR (217% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies TCR series: 2016=10.6 · 2017=8.8 · 2018=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies (288 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies
Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies (288 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Garvey Manor and Our Lady of the Alleghenies has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.2 2.8 13 0 0
2017 8.8 7.2 22 0 0
2016 10.6 7.1 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Hollidaysburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 26 employers in Hollidaysburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toby Weinman Assisted Living Residence 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSA Elms at Tanglewood DBA Trinity Elm Assisted Living 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carmel Village at Clovis 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Village Inc 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAIRFIELD PA 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eby-Brown West Mifflin 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2185 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3541 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLanahan Corporation 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garvey Manor 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollidaysburg Plant 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curry Supply - Hollidaysburg 178 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Holiday Lane Estates 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LSA Elms at Tanglewood DBA Trinity Elm Assisted Living 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-WIMIL38 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DCA - Airport United Airlines Offices 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leprino Foods, Allendale 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triumph Group Precision Components 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regal Beloit America, Inc. 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMRI Albuquerque 288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.