Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · California

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc.

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. safety composite

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2022→2023

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. injury rate improved

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 6.5 in 2022 to 4.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.5 · 2023=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO Sundstrom Pressed St…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sundstrom Pressed Steel Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. TCR series: 2022=6.5 · 2023=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 Stampings (except automotive, employers in California.

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc.
Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Gasket Manufacturing Engineerig, Inc. has fewer employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2022 6.5 6.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sundstrom Pressed Steel Co. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ronlen Industries Inc 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Friction Hinge Co 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecnocap LLC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Midlothian Family YMCA 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling Beaumont 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Anniston Dirt Cheap 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cbigg Management, LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE R11 St. Albans, VT 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE R21 Greater Baltimore, MD 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Plastics Inc 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.