Home centers, building materials · New York

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc.

Penn Yan, NY · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Home centers, building materials workplace, earning a grade D.

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 167% of Home centers, building materials BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. safety composite

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc.: 0.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2023

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 9.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444110 · Penn Yan, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 167% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #205/320
  • PHOTO 2609 MANSFIELD
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2609 MANSFIELD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (167% of the Home centers, building materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=9.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. falls in its industry

6,309 Home centers, building materia establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 320 Home centers, building materia employers in New York.

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. (29 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc.
Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. (29 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Home centers, building materials median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2022 7.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 15.3 3.8 4 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444110 · NY · Penn Yan

6,309 Home centers, building materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 23 employers in Penn Yan, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2609 MANSFIELD 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-1864 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-2252 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-1935 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Ridge Dairy LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Canandaigua 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Norwich 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Hospital 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR KANPAK Manufacturing Penn Yan 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silgan Plastics Penn Yan 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR KANPAKUS Manufacturing Penn Yan 169 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling Beaumont 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midlothian Family YMCA 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Leader Electric Supply (Pc1107) 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Benson Stone Company 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodbury Villa 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilderness Lake 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Options Minnesota - Main Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE American House - Rochester Village 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.