General Warehousing and Storage · Georgia

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations

Atlanta, GA · ~130 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations: 1.9 TCR = 33% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations safety composite

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2019→2024

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations injury rate improved

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #178/506
  • PHOTO 2929 S. Angus Ave
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2929 S. Angus Ave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations averages 1.9 TCR (33% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations TCR series: 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 506 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Georgia.

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations (130 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations
Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations (130 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 1
2021 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2019 3.8 2.5 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Atlanta

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2929 S. Angus Ave 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integra CI, Inc. - Mayaguez 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3902 GEODIS LOGISTICS 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4339 GEODIS LOGISTICS 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Georgia Turf, Inc 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rome Operating 224 Holmes Rd Rome 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carmichael Development LLC 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Concrete Construction Co., Inc. 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Seward Operating, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Polymer Molding, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PTI Technologies 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Worldwide Protective Products 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lahma - Houma Center 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nysga - New York 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wamys - Marysville Center 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodell Construction 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.