Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Pennsylvania

Seward Operating, LLC

New Florence, PA · ~67 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seward Operating, LLC runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade D.

Seward Operating, LLC: 1.9 TCR = 158% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seward Operating, LLC safety composite

Seward Operating, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Seward Operating, LLC: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Seward Operating, LLC's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · New Florence, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 158% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #30/46
  • PHOTO SHAWVILLE GENERATING…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SHAWVILLE GENERATING STATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Seward Operating, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seward Operating, LLC averages 1.9 TCR (158% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seward Operating, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=2 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Seward Operating, LLC falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 46 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Pennsylvania.

Seward Operating, LLC (67 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Seward Operating, LLC
Seward Operating, LLC (67 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Seward Operating, LLC has more employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 6.4 4.3 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · New Florence

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 7 employers in New Florence, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SHAWVILLE GENERATING STATION 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newark Energy Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calpine Geysers 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : Edgecombe Genco 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metzler Forest Products LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC OpCo, LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Utilities Lancaster 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAIN OFFICE 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conemaugh Generating Station 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR D&K Business Management, LLC dba Lodestar Bus Lines, Ligonier Division 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR 96920032-4 TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION-UNITED 33 FTE
NAT-TCR PTI Technologies 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gatla - Pratt Whitney Operations 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hibbs ElectroMechanical Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Systems Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Catherine's Manor of Washington Court House 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caledonia Spirits 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guido Lumber Company Inc 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Msmcc - Mc Comb 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.