ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY · North Carolina

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro

Greensboro, NC · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro runs at 423% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY workplace, earning a grade F.

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro: 16.1 TCR = 423% of ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro safety composite

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro: 18.5 → 20.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 21.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2019

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro's TCR rose 1.7 from 18.5 in 2016 to 20.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.1 · 423% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #338/356
  • PHOTO Portside of Grande D…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portside of Grande Dunes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro averages 16.1 TCR (423% of the ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro TCR series: 2016=18.5 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=21 · 2019=20.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro falls in its industry

6,510 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #338 safest of 356 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY employers in North Carolina.

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro (62 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro
Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro (62 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Greensboro has more employees than the ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 20.1 10.1 14 0 0
2018 21.0 18.0 14 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2016 18.5 10.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Greensboro

6,510 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portside of Grande Dunes 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF ALTOONA 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolling River Assisted Living 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living Normandy Park 16.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT -EST 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boseman Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Durham 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville - New Bern 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Material Distributors, Inc. 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulane University-National Primate Research Center 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Health & Rehab 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dennis Paper & Food Service 16.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodlawn Manor,Inc 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Mental Health Center - Conway 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Watertown 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Front Street Millwork and Lumber Inc. 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.