Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing · North Carolina

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas

Wilmington, NC · ~1,975 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas safety composite

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas held a steady TCR band

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2021 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.8 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Wilmington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO MPM Waterford
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~1,975 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MPM Waterford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas TCR series: 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas falls in its industry

418 Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manu establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manu employers in North Carolina.

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas (1,975 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas
GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas (1,975 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas has more employees than the Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.5 14 0 0
2023 0.5 0.3 12 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 5 1 0
2021 0.8 0.7 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · NC · Wilmington

418 Nuclear fuels, inorganic, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MPM Waterford 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PQ - Augusta Georgia Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VWR International - Solon 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Plant - El Dorado 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORP-System Wide 1,974 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duke Raleigh Hospital 1,984 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT2 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Community College 1,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Nuclear Fuels, Wilmington, NC 630 FTE
NAT-TCR West Valley UT Millwork 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JM Aviation 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vallourec Tube Alloy Houma 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nbcorp-B5510-New Braunfels Corporate 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Xavier University 1,975 FTE
NAT-SIZE Selfhelp Community Services Inc. 1,975 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Bernards Hospital 1,975 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Hub (Txant) 1,976 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.