Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

JM Aviation

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~34 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JM Aviation runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

JM Aviation: 0.6 TCR = 12% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JM Aviation safety composite

JM Aviation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

JM Aviation held a steady TCR band

JM Aviation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/137
  • PHOTO 2967-KS91
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2967-KS91 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

JM Aviation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JM Aviation averages 0.6 TCR (12% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JM Aviation TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where JM Aviation falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 137 Maintenance and repair service employers in Florida.

JM Aviation (34 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JM Aviation
JM Aviation (34 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

JM Aviation has fewer employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 0.7 1 3 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2967-KS91 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation - CSC San Antonio 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAX-FFM 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diehl Aerospace Inc. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato F 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFL Lauderdale Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - Delray Beach Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Vallourec Tube Alloy Houma 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valeo Smyrna Site 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Modular Fabrication 415 Yard Baton Rouge LA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Adventist Hcw Selma 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Shenandoah Univ Catering 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.