Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers · California

Gelsinger Meats, Inc.

Montrose, CA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Gelsinger Meats, Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 147% of Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. safety composite

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gelsinger Meats, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Gelsinger Meats, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424470 · Montrose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/22
  • PHOTO 2000 Plus Group Inc …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2000 Plus Group Inc dba Crescent Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gelsinger Meats, Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (147% of the Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Gelsinger Meats, Inc. falls in its industry

162 Meats and meat products (excep establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 22 Meats and meat products (excep employers in California.

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Gelsinger Meats, Inc.
Gelsinger Meats, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Gelsinger Meats, Inc. has fewer employees than the Meats and meat products (except canned, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424470 · CA · Montrose

162 Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 10 employers in Montrose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2000 Plus Group Inc dba Crescent Foods 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Kold Inc 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Kinnealey - 3210 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen Rose 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Verdugo Valley Skld Nsg & Wlns Centre 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Component West Inc 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trader Joe's 0052 Montrose 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montrose Healthcare Center 88 FTE
NAT-TCR Walnut Creek Cheese WC Retail 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR True Customer Solutions LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Santee Print Works 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Behavioral Health-Gaston (Court Drive) 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE C&B Fabrication LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trevdan - Poconos Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Storm King Group, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASH-VTA-ASHBURN 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.