Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Illinois

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC

Roanoke, IL · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC safety composite

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC: 2.1 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2023

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC's TCR rose 1.9 from 2.1 in 2022 to 4.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Roanoke, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #21/54
  • PHOTO MISSION SHEET METAL …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MISSION SHEET METAL INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.3

Where GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 54 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Illinois.

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC (48 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC
GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC (48 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

GEM Equipment & Manufacturing, LLC has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · IL · Roanoke

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 8 employers in Roanoke, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MISSION SHEET METAL INC. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Alloy Fabrication, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salem Metal, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winder Price Industries 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Marengo - 04WW 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirie Water Reclamation Plant 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Focus Development, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (Chicago) 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parsons Company INC 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN HOME OF ROANOKE ILLINOIS IN 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Sullivan Roanoke IL 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Tractor Inc. Roanoke IL 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Renewable Energy Facility 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Library 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Impact East 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wabash Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2003 William IH 35 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE McKinnon Co. Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Arts 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rancho Bernardo Computer Ctr - Bld: 5324 - 01 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.