Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) · Ohio

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS

Lima, OH · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade A.

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS: 0.9 TCR = 31% of Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS safety composite

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2017

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS injury rate improved

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Lima, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/50
  • PHOTO Mundy Maintenance an…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31827 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS averages 0.9 TCR (31% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.9

Where GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS falls in its industry

924 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 50 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Ohio.

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS (51 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS
GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS (51 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

GEM Industrial Inc. - Potash PCS has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, ind median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · OH · Lima

924 Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 243 employers in Lima, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31827 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deacon Construction, LLC - WA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Cleveland Office 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Devon Industrial Group 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Portsmouth Service Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Gas & Oil 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 922-NiSource-Zanesville OH-Muskingum Op Ctr 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Creek Contracting 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Ritas Medical Center 2,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Rita's Medical Center 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Ritas Medical Center 2,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIMA ENGINE 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR 31- South Sioux City 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Automation and Controls : GA - RCR - Rochester, NY 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ups National Turnpike (Kynat) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maser Consulting, Red Bank 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Maysville LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Nevada LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Seymour Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 84- Middletown 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.