Water treatment and distribution · California

Gene Pump Plant

Name: Gene Pump Plant Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Parker Dam, CA · ~104 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 2.5
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gene Pump Plant runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Gene Pump Plant: 2.5 TCR = 212% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gene Pump Plant safety composite

Gene Pump Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gene Pump Plant held a steady TCR band

Gene Pump Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.0 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Parker Dam, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 212% of ind

DART 1.1 DART
RANK #38/176
PHOTO Mukilteo Water & Was…
BOOK 6y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

West Point

2.6
Pennichuck Wat

2.6
This site

2.5
Mukilteo Water

2.5
New Castle Ope

2.5

What this shows Gene Pump Plant averages 2.5 TCR (212% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Gene Pump Plant TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Gene Pump Plant falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Gene Pump Plant (104 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Gene Pump Plant has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	1.1	1.1	0	1
2021	3.3	0.0	2	1
2020	3.3	2.2	2	1
2019	4.3	2.2	4	0
2018	2.2	0.0	1	1
2017	1.0	1.0	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Parker Dam

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District	MUKILTEO, WA	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	New Castle Operation	NEW CASTLE, PA	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	West Point	HIGHLAND FALLS, NY	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pennichuck Water Works Inc - Main Office	MERRIMACK, NH	2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	farm management inc	BALLICO	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kendall Farms LP	FALLBROOK	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Maple Dairy L.P	BAKERSFIELD	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Veg-Land, Inc.	FULLERTON	104 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Gene Pumping Plant	Parker Dam	106 FTE
NAT-TCR	1466 - Pottsville	Pottsville, PA	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	723 - Voorhees	Voorhees, NJ	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	239 - Canton-OH	North Canton, OH	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	UGI Central Penn Gas Frackville	Frackville, PA	2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	1104 - Brownsburg	Brownsburg, IN	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	990 - Quincy	Quincy, IL	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	952 - Orange City	Orange City, FL	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	515 - Frisco	Frisco, TX	104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.