Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · California

General Cable Corporation

Chino, CA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Cable Corporation runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade A.

General Cable Corporation: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Cable Corporation safety composite

General Cable Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

General Cable Corporation held a steady TCR band

General Cable Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Optical Cable Corpor…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Optical Cable Corporation Asheville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

General Cable Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Cable Corporation averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Cable Corporation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where General Cable Corporation falls in its industry

144 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in California.

General Cable Corporation (21 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Cable Corporation
General Cable Corporation (21 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

General Cable Corporation has fewer employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · CA · Chino

144 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Optical Cable Corporation Asheville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Elevator Products, Inc. - Battleboro 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwire DCN 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Elevator Products, Inc. - Rocy Mount 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Pella Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanahan High School 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mikro Systems, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bhavi Motel LLC - Pennsylvania 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE BNANS - Towneplace Suites by Marriott 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHAKM - Hampton Inn Kimball 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville Terminal 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.S.S. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.