Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing · Alabama

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems

Anniston, AL · ~243 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems safety composite

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems held a steady TCR band

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2018 to 0.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.8 · 2019=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336419 · Anniston, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO SGT HELO Facility
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~243 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SGT HELO Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems TCR series: 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems falls in its industry

41 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Guided missile and space vehic employers in Alabama.

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems (243 employees, TCR 0.7) among 21 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 193 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 22 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems
General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems (243 employees, TCR 0.7) among 21 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 193 employees and a TCR of 1.1

General Dynamics Ordnance & Tactical Systems has more employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle parts ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.8 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336419 · AL · Anniston

41 Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SGT HELO Facility 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Space 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL007 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL002 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunshine Mills Red Bay, AL 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1462 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT AUBURN UNIVERSITY EVS 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc. 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union Anniston 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components Anniston 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Masco Coatings Group Roanoke MFG 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Duro Bag - Jackson 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Falk 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tamco 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Illinois Valley Central SD #321 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Health Care Center - Formerly Kennedy Health Care Center 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland/Wicket 243 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.