Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations

Red Lion, PA · ~173 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations safety composite

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations: 0.6 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2017

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332993 · Red Lion, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO OTS - Marion, IL
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OTS - Marion, IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations falls in its industry

36 Artillery ammunition (i.e., mo establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Artillery ammunition (i.e., mo employers in Pennsylvania.

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations (173 employees, TCR 0.9) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 188 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 28 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations
General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations (173 employees, TCR 0.9) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 188 employees and a TCR of 1.7

General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion Operations has fewer employees than the Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332993 · PA · Red Lion

36 Artillery ammunition (i.e., more than 30 mm., more than 1.18 inch) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 19 employers in Red Lion, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OTS - Marion, IL 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nammo Pocal Inc. Plant 2 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Keyport_WA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EBAD-SY 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Melhorn Sales Service and Trucking 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tastepoint 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARCELORMITTAL MONESSEN 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE PhytogenX 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR RED LION BUS, INC. - RED LION 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Lion Bus Transportation 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106300 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6300 244 FTE
NAT-TCR 31- South Sioux City 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Automation and Controls : GA - RCR - Rochester, NY 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ups National Turnpike (Kynat) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maser Consulting, Red Bank 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westin Buckhead Atlanta 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester (Nyroc) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paducah (Kypad) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiawatha (Iahia) 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.