Industry profile · NAICS 332993

Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 38 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 36 establishments with a credible rate.

38
Employers
2.4
Avg TCR (rated)
3.3
BLS benchmark
538
Injuries (all)

TCR, interpreted

Below average

2.4 avg TCR

The industry picture

The 36 rated employers in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing average 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.4
avg TCR · rated subset
3.3
BLS national benchmark
36
rated employers
538
recordable injuries (all)

ITA inventory (38) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

What Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing sector (NAICS 332993) encompasses 38 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 538 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 36 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.4 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 1
EmployerLocationGradeAvg TCR
R. Stresau Laboratory, Inc.Spooner, WIF9.0
Expal USAHooks, TXF6.8
Enlight Group II LLCManitowoc, WID6.4
Action Mfg AtglenAtglen, PAD5.9
NGDS-MN32Elk River, MND4.8
Expal USANew Boston, TXD4.2
AMTEC CorporationJanesville, WIC3.9
Nammo Pocal Inc. ScrantonScranton, PAC3.5
Nammo Talley Inc.Mesa, AZC3.3
Nammo Defense SystemsMesa, AZC3.1
General Dynamics OTS GarlandGarland, TXC2.7
Nammo Pocal Inc. MoscowCovington Twp., PAC2.7
Combined Systems IncJamestown, PAB2.4
General Dynamics - OTS Garland TXGarland, TXB2.4
Aerojet Rocketdyne - SocorroSocorro, NMB2.2
Spectra Technologies LLCEast Camden, ARB2.0
Camden OperationsHampton, ARB1.9
American Ordnance LLCMiddletown, IAB1.7
General DynamicsMarion, ILB1.7
Aerojet Rocketdyne - TennesseeJonesborough, TNA1.6
The Ultra-met CompanyUrbana, OHA1.3
General Dynamics OTS(DRI), IncAnniston, ALA1.1
Textron Systems - WilmingtonWilmington, MAA1.0
EBAD-SYSimsbury, CTA1.0
Nammo Pocal Inc. Plant 2Covington Twp., PAA0.9
OTS - Marion, ILMarion, ILA0.9
General Dynamics OTS - Red Lion OperationsRed Lion, PAA0.9
Raytheon_Keyport_WAKeyport, WAA0.8
Excelitas Technologies - Miamisburg, OhioMiamisburg, OHA0.8
L3 Fuzing & Ordnance SystemsCincinnati, OHA0.7
Textron SystemsWilmington, MAA0.7
EBAD-GMGraham, KYA0.7
EBAD-MKMoorpark, CAA0.5
NGDS-MN07Plymouth, MNA0.4
L3Harris Technologies Fuzing & Ordnance SystemsCincinnati, OHA0.4
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems St. PetersburgSt. Petersburg, FLA0.2
Nammo Pocal Inc.Scranton, PAC0.0
Huntsville - RocketsHuntsville, ALC0.0

Nationwide industries with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing: nearest NAICS cohorts by rated-subset average TCR and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-industry neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing?

Across 36 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing averages 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing?

38 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 36 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.

Data sourced from official public datasets, PlainSafetyScore's OSHA ITA / BLS-based industry database (2016-2024). Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore. See our methodology for details.

Working in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.

Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing Safety FAQ

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing?

Across 36 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing averages 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Arming and fusing devices, missile, manufacturing?

38 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 36 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.