Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Pennsylvania

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP)

Scranton, PA · ~263 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade B.

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP): 2.0 TCR = 62% of Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) safety composite

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP): 2.1 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.95× in 2024

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP)'s TCR rose 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Scranton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #5/35
  • PHOTO ATI Forged Products …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATI Forged Products - Cudahy Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=3 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) falls in its industry

241 Hot forgings made from purchas establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 35 Hot forgings made from purchas employers in Pennsylvania.

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) (263 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP)
General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) (263 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) has more employees than the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.0 16 1 0
2023 3.0 2.7 10 0 0
2022 1.4 0.9 4 1 0
2021 1.6 1.6 3 2 0
2020 1.8 1.2 5 1 0
2019 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2018 1.3 0.9 4 0 0
2017 2.1 1.4 6 0 0
2016 2.1 0.9 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · PA · Scranton

241 Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 156 employers in Scranton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATI Forged Products - Cudahy Operations 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Forge Group, LLC dba Portland Forge 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellwood Crankshaft Group 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Forge Group, LLC dba Portland Forge - Lebanon 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE B.J. Baldwin Electric Inc. 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multi-color Corporation York 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueScope Buildings North America BBNA 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burpee 300 Park 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geisinger Community Medical Center 1,910 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCMC - MAIN CAMPUS 1,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Services S.N.C 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Services Rehab Hospital 580 FTE
NAT-TCR Jena Tool Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakdale Plywood - WP 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #6527 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tiff`s Treats - H5 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Timberlake Florida Service Center 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw Walker LA, LLC 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Component Assembly Systems 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.