Condominium, single-family, construction general contractors · Florida

Timberlake Florida Service Center

Orlando, FL · ~263 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timberlake Florida Service Center runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Condominium, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Timberlake Florida Service Center: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Condominium, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timberlake Florida Service Center safety composite

Timberlake Florida Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2022→2024

Timberlake Florida Service Center injury rate improved

Timberlake Florida Service Center's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.6 in 2022 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.6 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #32/70
  • PHOTO D.R. Horton, Inc. - …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D.R. Horton, Inc. - Orlando West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Timberlake Florida Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timberlake Florida Service Center averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Condominium, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timberlake Florida Service Center TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Timberlake Florida Service Center falls in its industry

976 Condominium, single-family, co establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 70 Condominium, single-family, co employers in Florida.

Timberlake Florida Service Center (263 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Timberlake Florida Service Center
Timberlake Florida Service Center (263 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Timberlake Florida Service Center has more employees than the Condominium, single-family, construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2023 2.6 1.6 8 0 0
2022 2.6 1.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · FL · Orlando

976 Condominium, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Orlando West 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fraser Construction Company 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton - Jackson 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BC Admin Services LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cone & Graham, Inc. 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMTC 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safe Harbor Rybovich West Palm 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM CENTRAL FLORIDA 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Mje, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR State College store 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Concord 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BIC Charlotte Distribution 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Component Assembly Systems 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics-OTS (SCAAP) 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw Walker LA, LLC 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.