Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center

Pontiac, MI · ~308 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center: 9.9 TCR = 183% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center safety composite

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center held a steady TCR band

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 10.0 in 2022 to 9.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.0 · 2023=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Pontiac, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.9 · 183% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #148/165
  • PHOTO LW Engineering Plant 8
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~308 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LW Engineering Plant 8 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center averages 9.9 TCR (183% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center TCR series: 2022=10 · 2023=9.7 · BLS 5.4

Where General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center (308 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center
General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center (308 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

General Motors - Pontiac Metal Center has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.7 3.9 20 15 0
2022 10.0 5.1 26 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Pontiac

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LW Engineering Plant 8 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prince Metal Stampings USA, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Wings Industries, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stampline 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5097 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW9 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCA PONTIAC (17575) 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE WORK AT HOME-MI-EATON - DHHS 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Chesterfields Health Care Center 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hildegard Health Center 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorton Va (Newington) 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City 083 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA - Aspers - 45 Aspers North Rd - Mott's LLP 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE SugarCreek Packing - BWB 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Betty Lou Lamoreaux Justice Center 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE F & G Mechanical Corporation 308 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.