Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufacturing · New York

General Motors Rochester Operations

Rochester, NY · ~1,000 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Motors Rochester Operations runs at 355% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

General Motors Rochester Operations: 11.7 TCR = 355% of Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Motors Rochester Operations safety composite

General Motors Rochester Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2021

General Motors Rochester Operations injury rate improved

General Motors Rochester Operations's TCR fell 1.2 from 13.5 in 2016 to 12.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.5 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=11.4 · 2021=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332510 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 355% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Flexco Grand Rapids …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 260 inj
  • SIZE ~1,000 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flexco Grand Rapids Main (1.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

General Motors Rochester Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Motors Rochester Operations averages 11.7 TCR (355% of the Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Motors Rochester Operations TCR series: 2016=13.5 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=11.4 · 2021=12.3 · BLS 3.3

Where General Motors Rochester Operations falls in its industry

189 Motor vehicle hardware, metal, establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Motor vehicle hardware, metal, employers in New York.

General Motors Rochester Operations (1,000 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate General Motors Rochester Operations
General Motors Rochester Operations (1,000 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4

General Motors Rochester Operations has more employees than the Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.3 9.1 62 29 0
2019 11.4 8.0 29 34 0
2018 9.6 6.1 39 63 0
2017 11.8 9.6 52 58 0
2016 13.5 10.7 78 52 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332510 · NY · Rochester

189 Motor vehicle hardware, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flexco Grand Rapids Main 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRAIN CUTTER COMPANY 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARPIN MANUFACTURING INC. 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Spas, Inc. 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon U.S.A.,Inc., Melville, NY 1,000 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY35160 999 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddy 1,001 FTE
STATE-SIZE SYRACUSE-NY79 998 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Casim - Simi Valley 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Huntley Park District REC Center 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North West Division 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy At Home 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capital Regional Medical Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Foods of Cumming 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Ford Bell R&D Center 1,000 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.