Manufacture of Printed Labels · Pennsylvania

General Press Corporation

Natrona Heights, PA · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Press Corporation runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufacture of Printed Labels workplace, earning a grade F.

General Press Corporation: 7.8 TCR = 236% of Manufacture of Printed Labels BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Press Corporation safety composite

General Press Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Press Corporation: 6.8 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

General Press Corporation's TCR rose 8.9 from 6.8 in 2017 to 15.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Natrona Heights, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 236% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #102/110
  • PHOTO Leader Printing - Ch…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leader Printing - Chippewa Falls 08-12 WI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

General Press Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Press Corporation averages 7.8 TCR (236% of the Manufacture of Printed Labels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Press Corporation TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 3.3

Where General Press Corporation falls in its industry

2,001 Manufacture of Printed Labels establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 110 Manufacture of Printed Labels employers in Pennsylvania.

General Press Corporation (44 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Press Corporation
General Press Corporation (44 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

General Press Corporation has fewer employees than the Manufacture of Printed Labels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 0.0 7 0 0
2023 11.9 6.0 2 2 0
2022 13.1 4.4 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 3 0 0
2017 6.8 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · PA · Natrona Heights

2,001 Manufacture of Printed Labels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 22 employers in Natrona Heights, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leader Printing - Chippewa Falls 08-12 WI 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PrintingCenterUSA 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield Printing Corp. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Labeling Solutions- Itasca, IL 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALLEGHENY VALLEY HOSPITAL 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3738 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3738 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Natrona Heights Operations (NHO) 161 FTE
NAT-TCR Orville Platt High School 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondelez Global - Streetsboro DSD 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR National Management Resources (Hastings College) 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Homeplace of Mondovi, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shakopee Lumber Yard 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scion Inc., dba Scion Steel 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Plastic Industries 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winsupply Dayton RDC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.