Other General Government Support · California

General Public Administration

San Diego, CA · ~87 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Public Administration runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other General Government Support workplace, earning a grade A.

General Public Administration: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Other General Government Support BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Public Administration safety composite

General Public Administration scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Public Administration: 1.3 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

General Public Administration's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #47/256
  • PHOTO Recreation Department
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Recreation Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

General Public Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Public Administration averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Other General Government Support BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Public Administration TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.2

Where General Public Administration falls in its industry

1,496 Other General Government Suppo establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 256 Other General Government Suppo employers in California.

General Public Administration (87 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate General Public Administration
General Public Administration (87 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

General Public Administration has fewer employees than the Other General Government Support median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.7 2 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2019 2.5 1.3 0 2 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · San Diego

1,496 Other General Government Support employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Recreation Department 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of York/Information Technology 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Phoenix G70 HumanRes 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Raleigh- Planning & Development Services 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Management, Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE farming 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. SAMBADO & SON INC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agromillora California 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Qorvo Oregon, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ada World Headquarters 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BNA1 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Railcar Repair 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fromm Reading Branch 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE idX Dallas 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4063 Albion College 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 62FW 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.