Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing · Georgia

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley

Fort Valley, GA · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley: 10.8 TCR = 326% of Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley safety composite

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley: 10.7 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2018

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley's TCR rose 1.7 from 10.7 in 2016 to 12.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327991 · Fort Valley, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 326% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #26/26
  • PHOTO Lannon Facility
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lannon Facility (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley averages 10.8 TCR (326% of the Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley TCR series: 2016=10.7 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=12.4 · BLS 3.3

Where General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley falls in its industry

313 Architectural sculptures, ston establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 26 Architectural sculptures, ston employers in Georgia.

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley (86 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley
General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley (86 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3

General Shale Arriscraft Fort Valley has more employees than the Architectural sculptures, stone, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.4 5.7 7 4 0
2017 9.1 6.8 7 1 0
2016 10.7 2.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327991 · GA · Fort Valley

313 Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 24 employers in Fort Valley, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lannon Facility 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cutting Edge Countertops, Inc. - Noblesville 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paxton Products Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Stone Veneer Inc., Tower City Manufacturing 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Operating Fleet 200 Miller Street Valdosta 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE VNG Newport News 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE LanzaJet 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitzgerald 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Bird Body Company 2,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Orchards Management 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEARSON FARM 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Valley, Georgia 138 FTE
NAT-TCR Topeka Baked Plant 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0408 - Butler, Pa 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Velocity US Properties 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR L3 Unidyne National City 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Livonia Woods-Livonia Woods SNF 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scenic Hills Care Center 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culpepper Cleaners, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prince Erachem LLC, New Johnsonville 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.