Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing · Michigan

Paxton Products Inc.

Lansing, MI · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Paxton Products Inc. runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Paxton Products Inc.: 10.6 TCR = 322% of Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Paxton Products Inc. safety composite

Paxton Products Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Paxton Products Inc.: 3.9 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Paxton Products Inc.'s TCR rose 3.1 from 3.9 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327991 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 322% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #9/11
  • PHOTO Quality Stone Veneer…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Stone Veneer Inc., Tower City Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Paxton Products Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Paxton Products Inc. averages 10.6 TCR (322% of the Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Paxton Products Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=11.1 · 2022=17.3 · 2023=7 · 2024=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Paxton Products Inc. falls in its industry

313 Architectural sculptures, ston establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 11 Architectural sculptures, ston employers in Michigan.

Paxton Products Inc. (40 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Paxton Products Inc.
Paxton Products Inc. (40 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Paxton Products Inc. has fewer employees than the Architectural sculptures, stone, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 4.6 3 0 0
2023 7.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 17.3 14.8 7 0 0
2021 11.1 8.9 5 0 0
2020 11.2 5.6 4 0 0
2019 13.5 8.1 5 0 0
2018 12.6 6.3 4 0 0
2017 12.2 4.0 3 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327991 · MI · Lansing

313 Architectural sculptures, stone, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Stone Veneer Inc., Tower City Manufacturing 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAWN BARBER INC / PHANEUF STONE 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lannon Facility 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLOFORM Countertops B 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan & Jerrys Pineview Greenhouse LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR MADO Healthcare Buena Park 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Niblock Excavating & Asphalt Inc 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford County Sheriff's Department 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ventura Family YMCA 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Fleet Aviation 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE PLZ Corp Distribution Warehouse 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Canopy at Boynton Ridge 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Canopy at Warner Robins 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.