Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Alabama

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant

Wilsonville, AL · ~264 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant: 1.7 TCR = 140% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant safety composite

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2018→2021

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant injury rate improved

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.2 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Wilsonville, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #22/28
  • PHOTO Newton Power Station
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newton Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant averages 1.7 TCR (140% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 28 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Alabama.

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant (264 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant
Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant (264 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Generation Fossil Gaston Steam Plant has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.3 0.4 3 0 0
2020 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2019 1.1 0.4 3 0 0
2018 3.2 2.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AL · Wilsonville

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 7 employers in Wilsonville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newton Power Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harry L. Oswald Power Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood Cogeneration 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHP - Gillette Neil Simpson (WY006) 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hanil USA 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE GH Metal Solutions, Loc'n 345 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2739 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.W. McMillan Memorial Hospital 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fossil Generation E.C. Gaston Steam Plant 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston Steam Plant - APC 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston Steam Plant 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston Fossil Plant 217 FTE
NAT-TCR Dairy Farm 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Baird Constructors LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR E.W. Tompkins Company, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Division #7 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Bay Hospital 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE L3Harris Aviation Products 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senator International Freight Forward LLC 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Triangle Construction 264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.