Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center

Rochester, NY · ~206 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center safety composite

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2022

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center injury rate improved

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center's TCR fell 7.4 from 9.3 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=6.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #316/616
  • PHOTO PARK ANAHEIM HEALTHC…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~206 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PARK ANAHEIM HEALTHCARE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=6.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #316 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center (206 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center
Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center (206 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Genesee Valley Presbyterian Nursing Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2021 7.1 0.9 8 0 0
2019 6.8 0.6 11 0 0
2018 5.7 3.2 9 0 0
2017 4.7 1.8 8 0 0
2016 9.3 3.5 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Rochester

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PARK ANAHEIM HEALTHCARE CENTER 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Beach Rehab 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Location 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bay At Dyersburg 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Donnelly Mechanical Corp. 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Upstate Farms Cheese, LLC 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMA Life 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Environmental Group 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR QMT Associates, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S05373 - WM of IL - West (DeKalb) 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 406STP 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lunds & Byerlys, St. Louis Park 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heligear Acquisition Co. d.b.a Northstar Aerospace Chicago 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fineline Industries, LLC 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Stop & Shop 100421 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE GMC Farm 2 206 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.