Nursing homes · California

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center

Anaheim, CA · ~227 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade C.

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center safety composite

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center held a steady TCR band

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.1 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Anaheim, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #220/739
  • PHOTO Richmond Beach Rehab
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~227 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richmond Beach Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Anaheim Healthcare Center averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Park Anaheim Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 739 Nursing homes employers in California.

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center (227 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Anaheim Healthcare Center
Park Anaheim Healthcare Center (227 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Park Anaheim Healthcare Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.3 7 0 0
2023 3.1 1.9 4 1 0
2022 5.3 4.5 7 0 0
2021 8.2 6.7 7 4 1
2020 12.1 12.1 16 0 0
2019 4.3 2.9 6 0 0
2017 4.1 2.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Anaheim

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richmond Beach Rehab 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Location 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bay At Dyersburg 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 64 MILFORD CENTER - DE 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Channel Islands Vegetable Farms, Inc. 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farming2 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pacifico FLC, Inc 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn Seattle Southcenter 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Conveyor Concepts 743 Main St. 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Allentown 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE RW Dake Construction 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barts Electric Company Inc. 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tellepsen Builders, L.P. 227 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.