Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · California

GenMark Diagnostics Inc

Carlsbad, CA · ~1,031 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GenMark Diagnostics Inc runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

GenMark Diagnostics Inc: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GenMark Diagnostics Inc safety composite

GenMark Diagnostics Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

GenMark Diagnostics Inc injury rate improved

GenMark Diagnostics Inc's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.5 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Carlsbad, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #79/107
  • PHOTO rms Surgical Anoka
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~1,031 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: rms Surgical Anoka (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

GenMark Diagnostics Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GenMark Diagnostics Inc averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GenMark Diagnostics Inc TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where GenMark Diagnostics Inc falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 107 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in California.

GenMark Diagnostics Inc (1,031 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate GenMark Diagnostics Inc
GenMark Diagnostics Inc (1,031 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

GenMark Diagnostics Inc has more employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.1 14 0 0
2023 3.5 2.6 30 4 0
2022 2.5 2.4 8 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · CA · Carlsbad

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 218 employers in Carlsbad, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR rms Surgical Anoka 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountainside Medical Colorado 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ranfac Corp. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phillips-Medisize Eau Claire 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6795-86170B0199 1,031 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warner Bros. Pictures 1,031 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCP - Civic Center Plaza 1,031 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - CULVER CITY 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific 2,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legoland California Resort 2,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Sciences Solutions Group (LSG) Remote Employees 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR North Central Heart Clinic 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmers Pride Inc Plant 2 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MAP Installed Building Products Sagamore 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Muscatine Career/Support 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cabinetworks Group Middlefield Plant #2 1,031 FTE
NAT-SIZE Englewood 1,031 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette 1,031 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staffmark Group Internal Staff 1,031 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.