Community social service program administration · Minnesota
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette
Saint Paul, MN · ~1,031 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.5
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Community social service program administration workplace, earning a grade A.
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Community social service program administration BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette safety composite
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
74/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 0.49 per 100 workers
Safer than 85% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 78% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−0.6
2017→2024
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette injury rate improved
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=0.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 923130 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE
Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #5/11
- PHOTO Spokane 1330 N WASHI…
- BOOK 7y book
- INJ 29 inj
- SIZE ~1,031 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Spokane 1330 N WASHINGTON ST (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette
0.5 TCR
- Spokane 1330 N
Spokane 1330 N WASHINGTON ST
0.5 TCR
- JEFFERSON COUN
JEFFERSON COUNTY-L&N BUILDING
0.5 TCR
- KY CHFS DCBS P
KY CHFS DCBS PR5425
0.5 TCR
- SSA OCPC call
SSA OCPC call Center
0.4 TCR
What this shows Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Community social service program administration BLS benchmark).
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.2
Where Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette falls in its industry
169 Community social service progr establishmentsSafer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Community social service progr employers in Minnesota.
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette has more employees than the Community social service program adminis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
923130 · MN · Saint Paul
169 Community social service program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Spokane 1330 N WASHINGTON ST | 0.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | JEFFERSON COUNTY-L&N BUILDING | 0.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | KY CHFS DCBS PR5425 | 0.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | SSA OCPC call Center | 0.4 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Southwest Minnesota State University | 1,032 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial | 1,029 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | IWCO Chanhassen | 1,028 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | 2573-MN102 | 1,044 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | HE-Midway Corporate Campus | 2,194 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Minnesota Department of Public Safety | 2,100 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule | 1,486 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | FV St Josephs Hospital | 1,426 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Dole Fresh Vegetables | 0.5 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Interstate Batteries | 0.5 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Orl1-Dwh-Orlando Division | 0.5 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Wyoming Business Center | 0.5 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | CCP - Civic Center Plaza | 1,031 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Cabinetworks Group Middlefield Plant #2 | 1,031 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | GenMark Diagnostics Inc | 1,031 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Englewood | 1,031 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.