Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturing · California

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~132 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations safety composite

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2023→2024

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations injury rate improved

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations's TCR fell 1.4 from 4.5 in 2023 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.5 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #44/51
  • PHOTO Racine Metal-Fab, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Racine Metal-Fab, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gentex Corporation-Western Operations averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations TCR series: 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Gentex Corporation-Western Operations falls in its industry

242 Electrotherapeutic apparatus m establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 51 Electrotherapeutic apparatus m employers in California.

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations (132 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gentex Corporation-Western Operations
Gentex Corporation-Western Operations (132 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Gentex Corporation-Western Operations has fewer employees than the Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 4 0 0
2023 4.5 3.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

242 Electrotherapeutic apparatus manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Racine Metal-Fab, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlsbad Location 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vitrolife, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NKA 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midnight Harvest 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOHNSTON FARMS 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Irigoyen Farms, Inc. 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Orange County-Los Angeles 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Sweetwood of Williamstown Independent Living Comm 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JBS Swift Pork Company 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren's Wood Works Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinckneyville Community Hospital 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pottstown 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Slate Valley Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Chicago 10000 Bessie Coleman Dr 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prl Industries, Inc 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.