commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance · Tennessee

Geodis MHR CL Overhead

Nashville, TN · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Geodis MHR CL Overhead runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.

Geodis MHR CL Overhead: 3.0 TCR = 143% of commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Geodis MHR CL Overhead safety composite

Geodis MHR CL Overhead scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2017

Geodis MHR CL Overhead injury rate improved

Geodis MHR CL Overhead's TCR fell 6.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Nashville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.0 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/67
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Jo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks Joliet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Geodis MHR CL Overhead in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Geodis MHR CL Overhead averages 3.0 TCR (143% of the commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Geodis MHR CL Overhead TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Geodis MHR CL Overhead falls in its industry

2,560 commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 67 commercial and industrial mach employers in Tennessee.

Geodis MHR CL Overhead (52 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Geodis MHR CL Overhead
Geodis MHR CL Overhead (52 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Geodis MHR CL Overhead has more employees than the commercial and industrial machinery and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TN · Nashville

2,560 commercial and industrial machinery and equipment (except automotive and electronic) repair and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Joliet 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altorfer Inc. - East Peoria, IL - 1 Capitol Drive 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMC Group LLC - CB 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYLK TekExpress 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Etowah Utilities 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Powell Valley Electric Cooperative New Tazewell 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Ridge Utility District 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE TDK Construction Company 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Global Services Supply Chain Operations : Grove City, PA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian (Msmer) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DeAngelo Brothers Hazleton 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpin Haus 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Stonework, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Hartville LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Sikeston at Clearview Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckhead Meat of North Carolina 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.