Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Tennessee

Geon performance Solutions

Clinton, TN · ~96 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Geon performance Solutions runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade A.

Geon performance Solutions: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Geon performance Solutions safety composite

Geon performance Solutions scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2024

Geon performance Solutions injury rate improved

Geon performance Solutions's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Clinton, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO RTP COMPANY-DAYTON
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RTP COMPANY-DAYTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Geon performance Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Geon performance Solutions averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Geon performance Solutions TCR series: 2020=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Geon performance Solutions falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Tennessee.

Geon performance Solutions (96 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Geon performance Solutions
Geon performance Solutions (96 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Geon performance Solutions has more employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 2 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · TN · Clinton

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 35 employers in Clinton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RTP COMPANY-DAYTON 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polyone 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alphagary - Pineville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lyondellbasell 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHRG NSH 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grinder, Taber & Grinder, Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE HICKORY HOLLOW PKWY - CNS202 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Best Choice Roofing Middle Tennessee LLC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Bend Manufacturing 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aisin Automotive Casting Tennessee 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sl Tennessee, Lighting Division 707 FTE
CITY-NEAR SL Tennessee, Chassis Division 336 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Enterprises Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bad Dad 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Papillion Foods LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Midstate Construction Corporaton 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE U.S. Logistics, Inc 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Emeralds at Faribault 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville County Market 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Company 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.