Bus operation, school and employee · Pennsylvania

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg

Harrisburg, PA · ~160 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bus operation, school and employee workplace, earning a grade C.

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg: 3.7 TCR = 83% of Bus operation, school and employee BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg safety composite

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2023→2024

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg injury rate improved

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg's TCR fell 3.9 from 5.7 in 2023 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.7 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · Harrisburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #102/227
  • PHOTO First Student
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: First Student (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg averages 3.7 TCR (83% of the Bus operation, school and employee BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg TCR series: 2023=5.7 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg falls in its industry

1,574 Bus operation, school and empl establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 227 Bus operation, school and empl employers in Pennsylvania.

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg (160 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg
George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg (160 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

George Krapf Jr & Sons, Inc. - Harrisburg has more employees than the Bus operation, school and employee median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · PA · Harrisburg

1,574 Bus operation, school and employee employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR First Student 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 163015-Waterford | CT | CTG-901 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 303009-Lane | MD | 303009 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 293010-Tewksbury | MA | 293010 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chadwick Main/Misc 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mele & Mele & Sons, Inc. 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Godshall's Telford 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders/Redman Homes, Ephrata PA 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR Westfield 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ThedaCare Medical Center Waupaca 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Diverse Building Solutions, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Smallwood Management Company 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norfolk Sheraton 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apostolic Christian Home 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE East View Healthcare 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Miami 3900 NW 25th St 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.