Centers for documentation (i.e., archives) · Minnesota

George Latimer Central Library

Saint Paul, MN · ~165 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George Latimer Central Library runs at 436% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Centers for documentation (i.e., archives) workplace, earning a grade F.

George Latimer Central Library: 3.0 TCR = 436% of Centers for documentation (i.e., archives) BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George Latimer Central Library safety composite

George Latimer Central Library scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

George Latimer Central Library: 4.6 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

George Latimer Central Library's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.6 in 2019 to 5.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 519120 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 436% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO St Clair Shores Libr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St Clair Shores Library (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

George Latimer Central Library in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George Latimer Central Library averages 3.0 TCR (436% of the Centers for documentation (i.e., archives) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George Latimer Central Library TCR series: 2019=4.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 0.7

Where George Latimer Central Library falls in its industry

89 Centers for documentation (i.e establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Centers for documentation (i.e employers in Minnesota.

George Latimer Central Library (165 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate George Latimer Central Library
George Latimer Central Library (165 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9

George Latimer Central Library has more employees than the Centers for documentation (i.e., archive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 2.6 9 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2021 5.0 1.1 7 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.6 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

519120 · MN · Saint Paul

89 Centers for documentation (i.e., archives) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St Clair Shores Library 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Guilford Library 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux City Public Library 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Burbank - Library Administration 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham, MN (Arvig) 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE APTIM @ Flint Hills - Pine Bend 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Uhl Company, Inc - Maple Grove 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEI Electric, Inc 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR Mueller Service, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 64 - Oklahoma City 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 569 - Springfield 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 012m - Dallas Tx Rntl 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lendlease - Nashville Office 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0344 - Romeoville 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phrg Hou 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 701 - Branford 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.