Water treatment and distribution · South Carolina

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District

Georgetown, SC · ~78 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District runs at 431% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District: 5.2 TCR = 431% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District safety composite

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District injury rate improved

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.6 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.6 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Georgetown, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 431% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #13/20
  • PHOTO District Office
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: District Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Georgetown County Water and Sewer District averages 5.2 TCR (431% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=7 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Georgetown County Water and Sewer District falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 20 Water treatment and distributi employers in South Carolina.

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District (78 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Georgetown County Water and Sewer District
Georgetown County Water and Sewer District (78 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Georgetown County Water and Sewer District has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2023 7.0 2.4 4 2 0
2022 4.8 2.4 3 1 0
2021 4.8 2.4 3 1 0
2020 8.4 4.8 7 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · SC · Georgetown

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 53 employers in Georgetown, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR District Office 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robert Diemer Filtration Plant 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Distribution 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aqua Ohio, Inc. - Massillon 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charleston Gas Operations 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Administration 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc Cross 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hood Construction Company, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgetown County 765 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper - Georgetown Mill 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR 625 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 625 285 FTE
NAT-TCR Jepsen Electric, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #78 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NX Automotive Logistics USA, Inc. (ELP) 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR La Strada Contracting Company 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Citgo Lubricants 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signal Restoration USA 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon Flint Group 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Moline 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.