Water supply systems · California

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District

Georgetown, CA · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water supply systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District: 4.8 TCR = 398% of Water supply systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District safety composite

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2018→2024

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District injury rate improved

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Georgetown, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 398% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/176
  • PHOTO Ric-Man Construction…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ric-Man Construction Florida, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Georgetown Divide Public Utility District averages 4.8 TCR (398% of the Water supply systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Georgetown Divide Public Utility District falls in its industry

727 Water supply systems establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 176 Water supply systems employers in California.

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District (24 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Georgetown Divide Public Utility District
Georgetown Divide Public Utility District (24 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District has fewer employees than the Water supply systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 24.9 24.9 1 4 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Georgetown

727 Water supply systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ric-Man Construction Florida, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moulton Niguel Water District 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citizens Energy Group-Water 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wigen Water Technologies 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Four Points by Sheraton Richmond 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Napuck Salvage of Waupaca, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR French Ellison - Pharr 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Towlift Sewickley 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smith Paint Products 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.V.P., Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCartney's Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Diesel Tube 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.