Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing · Texas

Georgetown

Georgetown, TX · ~202 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Georgetown runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Georgetown: 6.3 TCR = 189% of Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Georgetown safety composite

Georgetown scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2016→2024

Georgetown injury rate improved

Georgetown's TCR fell 9.5 from 14.8 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Georgetown, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 189% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #129/161
  • PHOTO Atlantis Industries
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlantis Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Georgetown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Georgetown averages 6.3 TCR (189% of the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Georgetown TCR series: 2016=14.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=11 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Georgetown falls in its industry

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and ext establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #129 safest of 161 Motor vehicle moldings and ext employers in Texas.

Georgetown (202 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Georgetown
Georgetown (202 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Georgetown has more employees than the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 2.2 9 3 0
2023 3.8 0.5 7 1 0
2022 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2021 5.4 0.0 7 2 0
2020 6.3 3.8 10 0 0
2019 11.0 7.1 0 14 0
2018 6.8 5.1 0 8 0
2017 1.1 0.8 4 0 0
2016 14.8 8.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TX · Georgetown

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 104 employers in Georgetown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlantis Industries 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Energi Fenestration Solutions 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREATIVE MOLDING INC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schaefer Systems - Lodi, CA 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Greenspoint Service Center 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31041 - GOODYEAR - BEAUMONT 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cutlass Solar 2 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE L.A. Fuller & Sons Construction Ltd. 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Private Residence Georgetown TX 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Airborn, Inc. (Georgetown) 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwestern University 595 FTE
CITY-NEAR AirBorn, Interconnect 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Oaks Hospital 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryn Mawr Hospital 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooked - Timberville 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Badger State Ethanol, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Creek 37 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dick Lavy Trucking 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Solar Tempe Office 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Container Quitman 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.