Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing · Mississippi

Dart Container Quitman

Quitman, MS · ~202 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Container Quitman runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dart Container Quitman: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Container Quitman safety composite

Dart Container Quitman scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Dart Container Quitman injury rate improved

Dart Container Quitman's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Quitman, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P76
  • PHOTO Dart Container Litho…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dart Container Lithonia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Dart Container Quitman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Container Quitman averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Container Quitman TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dart Container Quitman falls in its industry

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufa establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Dart Container Quitman (202 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Container Quitman
Dart Container Quitman (202 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Dart Container Quitman has more employees than the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2020 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2019 3.6 2.0 7 0 0
2018 4.2 3.7 9 0 0
2017 1.7 1.3 4 0 0
2016 3.8 1.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · MS · Quitman

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 9 employers in Quitman, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dart Container Lithonia 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifoam North Andover 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dart Container Lancaster 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3A Composites USA - Glasgow 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marathon Cheese Booneville 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fusion Furniture Plant 2 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6340-IRBY-12 13 CORP 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0678 Flowood 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Health and Rehabilitation Center 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.C. Watkins Memorial Hospital 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard Industries Inc. (Quitman) 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quitman Pellets, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Economy Plumbing & Sheet Metal LLC dba Economy Plumbing & Air Conditioning 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DeKalb Mechanical, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Aerospace West Chester Division 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR YKK (USA) Inc. Snap and Button Products 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moorings Park Nursing Services 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macon 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kutol Products Company 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dick Lavy Trucking 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.