Grading construction sites · Georgia

Georgia Development Partners

Atlanta, GA · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Georgia Development Partners runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Grading construction sites workplace, earning a grade D.

Georgia Development Partners: 3.6 TCR = 129% of Grading construction sites BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Georgia Development Partners safety composite

Georgia Development Partners scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2017→2024

Georgia Development Partners injury rate improved

Georgia Development Partners's TCR fell 4.5 from 5.6 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=11.0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #31/42
  • PHOTO VersaGrade, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VersaGrade, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Georgia Development Partners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Georgia Development Partners averages 3.6 TCR (129% of the Grading construction sites BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Georgia Development Partners TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=11 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Georgia Development Partners falls in its industry

1,750 Grading construction sites establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 42 Grading construction sites employers in Georgia.

Georgia Development Partners (60 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Georgia Development Partners
Georgia Development Partners (60 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Georgia Development Partners has more employees than the Grading construction sites median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.5 4.9 4 0 0
2018 11.0 9.1 6 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · GA · Atlanta

1,750 Grading construction sites employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VersaGrade, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Earthworks LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potts & Callahan, Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dalton Hatchery 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Fulton Operating - 116675 Wills Road 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gainesville District - Jackson EMC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestwick Companies 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Dippin Dots 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Masonry & Associates, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Independence Corrugated LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE AutoGate Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cornerstone Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saver Group,Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cranston 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.