Surface active agents manufacturing · Illinois

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park

University Park, IL · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Surface active agents manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Surface active agents manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park safety composite

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park: 4.4 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2024

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park's TCR rose 0.6 from 4.4 in 2021 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325613 · University Park, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO ICT Walnut Grove
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ICT Walnut Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Surface active agents manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park TCR series: 2021=4.4 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park falls in its industry

66 Surface active agents manufact establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Surface active agents manufact employers in Illinois.

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park (75 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park
Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park (75 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Verdant Specialty Solutions University Park has more employees than the Surface active agents manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 2.5 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 0 1 0
2021 4.4 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325613 · IL · University Park

66 Surface active agents manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 49 employers in University Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ICT Walnut Grove 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kao Specialties Americas LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Applied Textiles, Inc. - Michigan Location 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilot Chemical Company - Lockland 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kankakee Nursery Co. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenhouse 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois American Water (Chicago Metro) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haier Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IGQ2 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Signal Corp (University Park) 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Signal Safety & Security Systems Group 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amex Nooter 407 FTE
NAT-TCR MH Masonry & Associates, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dippin Dots 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia Development Partners 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gibson County Utility District 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Botanist, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Transportation, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peak Resources Brookshire 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transbay Fire Protection Inc. 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.