Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Kentucky

Gerald Printing Bowling Green

Bowling Green, KY · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gerald Printing Bowling Green runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade A.

Gerald Printing Bowling Green: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gerald Printing Bowling Green safety composite

Gerald Printing Bowling Green scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gerald Printing Bowling Green held a steady TCR band

Gerald Printing Bowling Green's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Bowling Green, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/44
  • PHOTO Cimarron Label - North
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cimarron Label - North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Gerald Printing Bowling Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gerald Printing Bowling Green averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gerald Printing Bowling Green TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gerald Printing Bowling Green falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 44 Offset printing (except books, employers in Kentucky.

Gerald Printing Bowling Green (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Gerald Printing Bowling Green
Gerald Printing Bowling Green (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Gerald Printing Bowling Green has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · KY · Bowling Green

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cimarron Label - North 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6720 Hendersonville 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cenveo Discount Labels 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyde Park 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Appharvest Richmond Farm, LLC. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Earlington 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Earlington Operations Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Muldraugh Station 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR IN-NPDI-INDIANA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Morrison - Houston Division 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Petroleum Company, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkwest Casino Lotus 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE MJ Takisaki, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fenwick 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stockton Rubber Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Nursing Center 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.