Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis · Indiana

Cenveo Discount Labels

New Albany, IN · ~521 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cenveo Discount Labels runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis workplace, earning a grade A.

Cenveo Discount Labels: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cenveo Discount Labels safety composite

Cenveo Discount Labels scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2021

Cenveo Discount Labels injury rate improved

Cenveo Discount Labels's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · New Albany, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #2/48
  • PHOTO Gerald Printing Bowl…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~521 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gerald Printing Bowling Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cenveo Discount Labels in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cenveo Discount Labels averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cenveo Discount Labels TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Cenveo Discount Labels falls in its industry

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 48 Labels, commercial printing (e employers in Indiana.

Cenveo Discount Labels (521 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cenveo Discount Labels
Cenveo Discount Labels (521 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Cenveo Discount Labels has more employees than the Labels, commercial printing (except scre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 5 0 0
2019 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2018 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 4 0 0
2016 1.3 0.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · IN · New Albany

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 88 employers in New Albany, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gerald Printing Bowling Green 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cimarron Label - North 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6720 Hendersonville 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyde Park 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwire Bremen 521 FTE
STATE-SIZE PMC Muncie IN Locomotive 521 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakland Avenue 521 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thor Motor Coach/Plant 850 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Floyd 1,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samtec 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYX New Albany 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brook and Whittle, Ltd (Discount Labels) - New Albany 496 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakeland Quaker 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR New Hudson Facades - MN 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Yakima Pediatric Assoc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Keokuk Contractors LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodservice : BEDFORD PARK INJ 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magna Mirrors 128S 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottlers Cayey 521 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Losson Road 087 521 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.