Orchard cultivation services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery) · California

G&F Ag Service

Ripon, CA · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G&F Ag Service runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Orchard cultivation services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery) workplace, earning a grade C.

G&F Ag Service: 4.6 TCR = 102% of Orchard cultivation services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G&F Ag Service safety composite

G&F Ag Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

G&F Ag Service: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2024

G&F Ag Service's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115112 · Ripon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #39/86
  • PHOTO Royal Packing Yuma Az
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Packing Yuma Az (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

G&F Ag Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G&F Ag Service averages 4.6 TCR (102% of the Orchard cultivation services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G&F Ag Service TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where G&F Ag Service falls in its industry

221 Orchard cultivation services ( establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 86 Orchard cultivation services ( employers in California.

G&F Ag Service (48 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate G&F Ag Service
G&F Ag Service (48 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.8

G&F Ag Service has more employees than the Orchard cultivation services (e.g., brac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 7.3 7.3 4 0 0
2022 7.7 7.7 4 0 0
2021 6.1 4.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115112 · CA · Ripon

221 Orchard cultivation services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 27 employers in Ripon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Packing Yuma Az 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Liberty Bell 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Fertilizer & Grain Co 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service and Supply Cooperative, Bellflower MO 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 346 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethany Home Society of San Joaq 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ripon Winery 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burkett's Pool Plastering Inc 227 FTE
NAT-TCR J Becher & Associates Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ellicott Dredge Technologies, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mediacom Iowa City, IA. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Constellation Industries 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Region Cooperative - SE Agronomy East/BCA/Shop 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Billerica 171 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50031 - Capstone Kroger Ft Wayne 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.