Fire and rescue service · Illinois

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District

Plano, IL · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District runs at 463% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and rescue service workplace, earning a grade F.

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District: 14.8 TCR = 463% of Fire and rescue service BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District safety composite

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−133.3

2017→2024

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District injury rate improved

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District's TCR fell 133.3 from 133.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 333.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=133.3 · 2018=44.4 · 2020=333.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Plano, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 463% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #205/262
  • PHOTO Morton Grove Fire De…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morton Grove Fire Department Station 4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District averages 14.8 TCR (463% of the Fire and rescue service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District TCR series: 2017=133.3 · 2018=44.4 · 2020=333.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District falls in its industry

793 Fire and rescue service establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 262 Fire and rescue service employers in Illinois.

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District (48 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District
Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District (48 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District has fewer employees than the Fire and rescue service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 333.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 44.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 133.3 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Plano

793 Fire and rescue service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 30 employers in Plano, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morton Grove Fire Department Station 4 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Station #2 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson County Fire District No. 5 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vancouver Fire Dept Station 1 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Marengo - 04WW 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirie Water Reclamation Plant 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Focus Development, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (Chicago) 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1003 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1003 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR PLANO DC BLDG 221 - 3239 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR PLANO DC BLDG 223 - 3239 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Ashton Health and Rehabilitation 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Design-Build, LLC. 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clegg's Nursery LLC #4 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Daaquam Lumber Maine Inc. 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Cerrito Natural Grocery Company Prepared Food Annex 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE MSP 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.P. Gergen Co., Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adelanto 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.