Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions · Michigan

GHSP - Grand Haven

Grand Haven, MI · ~373 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GHSP - Grand Haven runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions workplace, earning a grade A.

GHSP - Grand Haven: 0.9 TCR = 17% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GHSP - Grand Haven safety composite

GHSP - Grand Haven scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2023

GHSP - Grand Haven injury rate improved

GHSP - Grand Haven's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Grand Haven, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/61
  • PHOTO TRW Automotive-Marsh…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~373 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRW Automotive-Marshall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

GHSP - Grand Haven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GHSP - Grand Haven averages 0.9 TCR (17% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GHSP - Grand Haven TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.4

Where GHSP - Grand Haven falls in its industry

320 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 61 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Michigan.

GHSP - Grand Haven (373 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GHSP - Grand Haven
GHSP - Grand Haven (373 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

GHSP - Grand Haven has more employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2018 1.9 1.7 8 0 0
2016 2.6 1.9 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · MI · Grand Haven

320 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 81 employers in Grand Haven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRW Automotive-Marshall 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lima Facility 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ada Tech Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Litehouse Inc. - Lowell 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell's Brewery 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE DTW - Airport United Airlines Offices 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpine Power Systems 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shape Corp - 14600 172nd Ave. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Ottawa Community Hospital 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Grand Haven Hospital-MH-MI 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Livingston Energy Group, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bennett & Brosseau Roofing, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Monosem, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Red River Biorefinery 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jc Lara Contractor Inc. 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro St. Augustine 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Pa 373 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.