Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc.

Columbus, IN · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 19% of Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. safety composite

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc.: 0.9 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.1 from 0.9 in 2020 to 2.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Columbus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/41
  • PHOTO Meritor Fletcher
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meritor Fletcher (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (19% of the Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0.9 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=2 · BLS 5.4

Where Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. falls in its industry

320 Transmissions and parts, autom establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 41 Transmissions and parts, autom employers in Indiana.

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc.
Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Nagakura Engineering Works Co, Inc. has fewer employees than the Transmissions and parts, automotive, tru median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IN · Columbus

320 Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meritor Fletcher 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lima Facility 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ada Tech Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon - Dayton 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE phil's fishing 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noblesville Office 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Contractors, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town of Bargersville 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR 1004-77 GoJet MX Hangar RIC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Graphic Village Blue Ash 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Swing Staging LLC - New York 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Altium Packaging - Verona 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TSE International 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bradford Built Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwood Care, LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE NP 5th, LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.